Agent-Tier Benchmark Rankings
Terminal-Bench 2.x
shell agent loops
Missing scores:Kimi K2.7 Code, Grok Build 0.1, MiMo v2.5 Pro, Ring 2.6 1T, ERNIE 5.1, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen3-Coder-Next, Claude Haiku 4.5, DS V4 Pro Max, Agnes 2.0 Flash, Fugu Ultra, Cohere North Mini Code
SWE-bench Pro
single-pass code review
Missing scores:Kimi K2.7 Code (has SWE-V 62.0 not Pro), Hy3 (has SWE-V 74.0 not Pro), Llama 4 Maverick (has SWE-V 70.4 not Pro), Mistral Large 3 (has SWE-V 76.2 not Pro), Nemotron 3 Ultra (has SWE-V 71.9 not Pro), Step 3.5 Flash (has SWE-V 74.4 not Pro), DS V4 Pro Max (42 benchmarks, no Pro breakdown)
MCP-Atlas
multi-tool use
Missing scores:Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Mythos 5, Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Grok 4.3, Grok Build 0.1, Nemotron 3 Ultra, Step 3.7 Flash, Step 3.5 Flash, MiniMax M3, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen3-Coder-Next, Hy3, Ring 2.6 1T, MiMo v2.5 Pro, ERNIE 5.1, Agnes 2.0 Flash, DS V4 Pro Max
SWE-Marathon & Long-Horizon Evidence
sustained multi-hour agent quality
Missing: Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.3, Step 3.7, Hy3, Sonnet 5, MiniMax M3 — no Marathon/DeepSWE scores yet. Sonnet 5 TB 80.4% suggests strong long-horizon potential.
Cost-Performance Map
Terminal-Bench score vs $/M output (log scale)
●80+ excellent●65-79 strong●50-64 moderate●25-49 weak●<25 poor●no score
dashed line = optimal frontier · point color = score band (same as bar charts)